-
Performing Kano Analysis (Understanding the Concepts)
8 Lessons
A practical, accredited course on the Kano Model — design professional surveys, classify features into the five quality categories, and automate the full analysis in Microsoft Excel.
Feature decisions made on gut feel or anecdote lead to products that miss what matters most.
Every stakeholder has a favourite feature. Without a measurement framework, there is no objective way to separate must-haves from nice-to-haves from features nobody cares about.
Traditional satisfaction surveys treat all features the same. The Kano approach separates basic expectations from performance drivers from genuine delighters — three entirely different problems requiring different responses.
Without data to anchor decisions, every sprint planning session restarts the debate. Better/Worst coefficients give teams a shared, quantified basis for prioritization that holds up under pressure.
Manual classification of survey responses is too slow for real product cycles. The Excel automation in this course reduces the classification and summary work from days to under an hour.
Each section adds a distinct capability, and the sections are designed to be taken in order.
A product team surveys 150 users about 12 proposed features. Battery life extension is Must-be (high Worst coefficient), a new camera AI mode is Attractive (high Better, low Worst), and a home-screen widget lands as Indifferent. The Better/Worst chart makes the development priority obvious: fix the battery baseline, invest in the camera delight feature, and drop the widget entirely.
A hotel group surveys guests about 10 service touchpoints. Fast check-in is One-dimensional (satisfaction scales with speed), complimentary local recommendations are Attractive (delight when offered, no dissatisfaction when absent), and room service menu size is Indifferent. The analysis redirects investment from menu variety — which guests barely notice — toward check-in speed and experience extras that create genuine advocacy.
Structured video lessons covering the complete Kano Model, survey methodology, and Excel implementation, plus a 20-question final exam to verify your learning.
A ready-to-use Excel workbook with INDEX/XMATCH classification logic, COUNTIF summaries, and a pre-built Better/Worst scatter chart. Bring your own CSV and the analysis runs automatically.
Guidance on crafting effective functional and dysfunctional questions, structuring the five-response scale, and limiting surveys to the recommended maximum of 20 features.
Practice questions at the end of each section to test your understanding of the Kano categories, evaluation matrix, and coefficient calculations before moving on.
A Quality Gurus Inc. certificate of completion and a digital badge you can share on LinkedIn, carrying 2.0 PMI PDUs and 2.0 CPD hours toward your professional development requirements.
This course is approved by PMI through Quality Gurus Inc. (ATP #6034) and carries 2.0 Professional Development Units, applicable toward PMP, CAPM, and all other PMI credential renewals.
You decide which features make the roadmap. Kano Analysis gives you a structured, data-driven method to justify those decisions to stakeholders.
The Kano Model appears in the ASQ Body of Knowledge under Voice of the Customer and QFD. This course deepens your applied knowledge and earns 2.0 PDUs.
The Define phase of DMAIC requires you to translate the Voice of the Customer into measurable requirements. Kano Analysis is the tool that structures that translation.
You gather and prioritize requirements for projects and systems. Kano Analysis adds a rigorous quantitative layer to requirements prioritization that goes beyond stakeholder interviews alone.
You run surveys to understand what customers want. This course gives you a structured survey framework that produces actionable feature priorities, not just satisfaction scores.
If your role involves deciding what to build, improve, or invest in, Kano Analysis gives you a practical, accredited methodology to make those decisions on evidence.
“I've used satisfaction surveys for years but never had a structured way to turn them into priorities. The Better/Worst chart finally gave me that. The Excel template alone was worth the course.”
“Clear, practical, and well-structured. The section on functional vs. dysfunctional questions changed how I approach customer research. Sandeep explains the evaluation matrix in a way that finally makes sense.”
“I was studying for my CQE and needed to understand the Kano Model properly. This course covers it far more deeply than any textbook I found. The PDUs were a bonus.”
30-day satisfaction guarantee · Cancel within 30 days for a full refund
The Kano Model, the evaluation matrix, the Better/Worst coefficients, and the Excel automation — all in one accredited course.
One-time payment · 365 days access · 30-day satisfaction guarantee
The Kano Model, professional survey design, Better/Worst coefficients, and the complete Excel workflow — all in one accredited course with a ready-to-use template.
Reviews